关于金融创新相关论文范本,与金融证券化和法律监管的法律经济学相关论文格式模板
本论文是一篇关于金融创新相关论文格式模板,关于金融证券化和法律监管的法律经济学相关本科毕业论文范文。免费优秀的关于金融创新及金融风险及法律经济学方面论文范文资料,适合金融创新论文写作的大学硕士及本科毕业论文开题报告范文和学术职称论文参考文献下载。
people’ssituationsgetbetterexceptC.Butduringthissecuritization,Cislikelytobethecarrierofinterests,eventobethehotbedofcorruptionintherealmarketeconomy.Intheformofgiftgivingbribestomeettheinterestsofothers,itsessenceistoseekahigherinterestinthefuture.AndCtunnelsinterestsbymeansofcouponthatismuchmoreindirectthanmoneysothatitisunfavorabletolegalsupervisionandverification.Butthisriskoftunnelingundertheveilofsecuritizationisbiggerandtheharmisgreater.3.Theriskofindirectcollusiondamage
WhyAdaretosellthecouponwhoseparvalueis$100tothedealerBatthelowpriceof$65.That’sbecauseAtakesfullaccountofmarketdemandandmarketsupplyandthenmakesthisrationalbehavior.Intherealmarketeconomy,weoftenseethatmanypaniessuchasCfreedistributethecouponwhoseparvalueis$100toemployees.Asforpanies,theybuycouponsatthepriceof$80thatislowerthan$100,whosediscountis80%.WhypaniesenjoysuchdiscountThereexistsindirectcollusionamongthemanufacturerA,thedealerB,thepanyC,whichwillgiverisetocollateraldamagetoD.AlthoughDgetsthecouponwhoseparvalueis$100,thisisnotrealmoneybutsecurityonbehalfofmooncake.Theproblemincludes:
有关论文范文主题研究: | 关于金融创新的论文范本 | 大学生适用: | 硕士论文、硕士论文 |
---|---|---|---|
相关参考文献下载数量: | 68 | 写作解决问题: | 学术论文怎么写 |
毕业论文开题报告: | 论文任务书、论文目录 | 职称论文适用: | 核心期刊、职称评中级 |
所属大学生专业类别: | 学术论文怎么写 | 论文题目推荐度: | 优秀选题 |
本篇论文url http://www.sxsky.net/guanli/00104497.html
First,mooncakeisnotdailynecessities,whosedemandelasticityisbigger.Notallofemployeeswhoobtainthecouponwillexchangethem.Themooncakevaluing$100isabigamountandtheycannotrunoutofthemsothatitisabetterchoiceforthemtosellthiscouponinordertogetrealmoneyimmediately.Becausepeopletryingtoexchangecouponaresomanythatscalpermarketesintobeing.Themarketsupplyishugewhilethemarketdemandisrelativelystablewhichleadstothepriceofmooncakecouponbeingbeatdownverylow—only$40.
Second,panyshoulddirectlypay$100toemployeesbecausetheyoriginallybelongtothem,butpanychoosetobuythecouponwhoseparvalueis$100whilethepriceis$80andthengivethemtoemployees.Actually,panydirectlyobtain$20—theprofitofCisnot$-80.Andtheprofitofemployeeisnottheparvalueof$100butonly$40becauseholderswanttoselloffthemtoexchangerealmoneytimely.
Table2:Cost-BenefitAnalysis
(二)SqueezeriskandmarketriskFurtheranalysisTable1,wewilleasilyfindthatmooncakemanufacturernotonlycreatessecuritizationbutalsocreatessecuritizatio
关于金融创新相关论文范本
AscanbeseenintheTable1,everybodyseemstomakeprofitsfromthissecuritization.ButsupposingallofDexchangethecoupontomooncakeasanalyzedintheTable2,andwewillgetcost-benefitanalysislikeTable3.
Aissuesmooncakecouponwhoseparvalueis$100/sheet,andthensellsittothedealerBatthepriceof$65/sheet.(BissimilartoinvestmentbankorSecurityCompanyinthefinancialmarket)BsellsittoCatthepriceof$80.AsforC,itis80%discount.WhyCbuyitfromBotherthanothermooncakemanufacturers(Thereexistintereststunnelingandcollusion,whichwilldamagepotentialinterestsofD.)IfnotmostofDsellsthecoupontothethirdparty-E(scalper)butdirectlyexchangethecoupontomooncake.SoAwillbetrappedinthedilemma.
Supposingthereisprobabilityk(0
Table3:Cost-BenefitAnalysis
(三)Financialcrisisandmarketreconstruction
Lookingbackfinancialcrisis,mostofthemarecausedbyso-calledinnovation.Innovationgivesrisetoirrationalexuberanceandleadstomadnessofhuman,butmakespeoplefettheriskofinnovationwhichtheyshouldhave.Suchastheearliest“tulipbubble”in1637,“southseabubble”in1720andthelatest“interbubble”in2000and“subprimecrisis”in2008.
Financialinnovationhasprovidedpeoplewithahighprofitbutalsobroughtincalculablerisks.Everyfinancialcrisishasbroughtfataldestructiontofinancialmarketandrealeconomy.Financialinnovationcannotbebuiltonthesandanddust,eveniffinancializationgivesrisetoirrationaldevelopmentandprompteconomyunlimitedprosperity.Butoncepeoplerealizethatstormising,thebasisofthedustwillshakeandflyawaywiththewind.Andthiselegantfinancialbuildingisalsonotfarfromdestruction.Accordingtothedataoffinancialcrisisin2008,theglobalGDPofrealeconomyis$61trillionbuttheglobalGDPoffinancialeconomy(virtualeconomy)amountsupto$600trillion.ThinkingaboutEquationofexchange(FisherEquation):M.V等于P.T.Where,foragivenperiod,Misthetotalnominalamountofmoneyincirculationonaverageinaneconomy.Visthevelocityofmoney,whichistheaveragefrequencywithwhichaunitofmoneyisspent.Pisthepricelevel.Tisanindexofrealexpenditures.M.V等于P.T.meansthatfinancialeconomy等于realeconomy.Butthemadnessofpeoplehasalreadysurpassedthelimitsofthemarket,whichfinallyleadstothecollapseofthemarketandfinancialcrisis.